icehound wrote:
Every other professional sport has a publicized (though, not open) review process, with baseball and football going as far as releasing results to the media regarding disciplinary or disqualifying (for the playoffs) actions directed at their officiating crews...
The NHL continues to display secrecy, and arrogance regarding the "paying public's" right to know about officiating policies, review and disciplinary action.
It harms the credibility of the sport, by concealing any proactive policies which might address such serious issues as professional competence, bias and any form of officiating decision reflecting negligence or recklessness, on the ice.
This absence of transparency is a fundamental criticism directed at the NHL's apparent lack of officiating consistency and professional accountability.
It casts doubt on the outcome of each and every contest, played over an entire season. And it does a terrible disservice to the league, its' players and what officials there are who are genuinely involved, responsible and competent in their profession.
When a crew throws "everything but the kitchen sink" at a team, or calls "ghosts" or becomes selectively blind - over the course of a game, or at critical points in a given contest - It gives one (as a fan, or a "scholar" of the game) pause...It causes one to wonder: If this can be allowed to occur, leaguewide, over an entire season, what kind of corrosive effect does it have on the standings? And what result in the playoffs? And what of the cumulative effect, as it pertains to the final champion of any given season?
Did Tampa really deserve the Cup against Calgary in '03-'04? What of Carolina's win in '05-'06? How did the Ducks manage a Cup, in the first season of the finesse-based "New NHL" when they were one of the most penalized teams in the league? Why are these southern expansion teams suddenly winning a statistically-relevent number of championships? Is there a broader agenda directing officiating bias?
If such nonsense continues; if an absence of accountability is allowed to cast doubt on the results of each and every game, the overall Game of Hockey will be damaged by a lack of professional credibility, and a lessened sense of integrity.
A sense that "things are rigged" to favor a certain outcome will diminish fan-interest; It will undermine a primary reason for viewership: The HOPE that one's team can win a championship - Fair and square.
Ice, you always are the voice of reason. I was thinking this same thing last night. It seemed almost fixed with the calls that were ignored. I told my husband, a TB player could pull down the pants of a Sabre and slap his ass and it would go unnoticed. (except by us) The Roy incident was the most out loud.
I used to not like hockey because it seemed fixed like the WWF. Last night seemed that way to me.
_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris.
