It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 2:46 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:16 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
No head hunting with body armor = no head injuries.

Head hunting with small pads = head injuries to an unkown extent, but maybe/probably less than w/ body armor.

Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:22 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:43 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
Why don't you forward that to Booth and Drury...and I'll just take that response as an acknowledgement that you can't counter my last post with anything worth a damn.


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:45 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
Take it however you want, old chum.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:50 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
No head hunting with body armor = no head injuries.

Head hunting with small pads = head injuries to an unkown extent, but maybe/probably less than w/ body armor.

Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


I agree with you. I don't see any way you can justify going after someone's head (intent to injure) regardless of the equipment.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Wyohomeboy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 1343
Location: Parts Unknown, Wyoming
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
No head hunting with body armor = no head injuries.

Head hunting with small pads = head injuries to an unkown extent, but maybe/probably less than w/ body armor.

Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


I agree with you. I don't see any way you can justify going after someone's head (intent to injure) regardless of the equipment.


You can't justify going after someones head, ever. The point that is trying to be made is that when you have softer equipment it hurts your shoulder a lot more than if you have hard plastic protecting them - that prevents a lot of those hits. If you ever had to play a contact sport with cotton pads instead of hard plastic, it would be crystal clear.

_________________
-------------------------------------------------------
"I don't feel like Satan, but I am to them"
Neil Young


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Wyohomeboy wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
No head hunting with body armor = no head injuries.

Head hunting with small pads = head injuries to an unkown extent, but maybe/probably less than w/ body armor.

Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


I agree with you. I don't see any way you can justify going after someone's head (intent to injure) regardless of the equipment.


You can't justify going after someones head, ever. The point that is trying to be made is that when you have softer equipment it hurts your shoulder a lot more than if you have hard plastic protecting them - that prevents a lot of those hits. If you ever had to play a contact sport with cotton pads instead of hard plastic, it would be crystal clear.


"Shoulder hits to the head have always been legal, yet the problem with concussions has suddenly become a major problem."

page 1

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Wyohomeboy wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
No head hunting with body armor = no head injuries.

Head hunting with small pads = head injuries to an unkown extent, but maybe/probably less than w/ body armor.

Clearly the root cause is head hunting, but it's more fun to be a smart ass than address the issue logically.


I agree with you. I don't see any way you can justify going after someone's head (intent to injure) regardless of the equipment.


You can't justify going after someones head, ever. The point that is trying to be made is that when you have softer equipment it hurts your shoulder a lot more than if you have hard plastic protecting them - that prevents a lot of those hits. If you ever had to play a contact sport with cotton pads instead of hard plastic, it would be crystal clear.

So you're saying that the players should wear softer pads, thus incurring a large swath of individuals with wrecked shoulders or elbows, instead of addressing the problem that is head-hunting?

(I could swear I just posted in this thread, but my response seems to have gotten eaten)

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Wyohomeboy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:28 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 1343
Location: Parts Unknown, Wyoming
Not quite that cut and dried Phil, maybe a happy medium with a little softer pads, harsher crackdowns on headshots, and doing away with the instigator rule for starters.

_________________
-------------------------------------------------------
"I don't feel like Satan, but I am to them"
Neil Young


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
Why are head shots such a problem now? The 70's may have been the most blood thirsty era in NHL history but this never was a big deal. Could it be, might it be, it is! It's the pads that turned into weapons of mass destruction!!!

Why not give the players guns and then act shocked when someone gets shot?

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:22 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Given that you're such an authority on equipment-related hockey psychology, ETC, why don't you provide some concrete studies and statistics?

Seems to me that the vastly-increased size, speed, and skill of the game today, combined with officiating that takes self-policing out of the game and possibly the respect with it, are the causes of all of these shenanigans. Players were comparatively lumbering oafs with big fists (EDIT: the types of players that would today be handing out these murderous hits), from a lot of what I saw in highlights, old video, and classic games shown on NHLN. Now, you've got cruise missiles on ice skates. Regardless of equipment, the KO hit is sought after with reckless abandon. Hard plastic or no hard plastic, a guy is going to get knocked the fuck out when he gets plowed through with a guys shoulder going at 50 mph.

Wyo brings up lacrosse...I'd like to point out that, as an avid fan of lacrosse, the indoor game is just as violent as hockey, and played with a lot of the same equipment (some of it 99% identical), but this just isn't a problem in the indoor game. Huh, imagine that.

_________________
mechaphil


Last edited by mechaphil on Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:44 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Uh didn't they not wear helmets in the 70s? It's not a pads issue, it's a respect issue. Players don't respect each other, and they don't respect the consequences of headhunting. If you're not going to let the players enforce it (the instigator), then the league has to crack down on headhunting.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
SchonyGal
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:57 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:26 am
Posts: 2279
Location: WNY
End The Curse wrote:
The 70's may have been the most blood thirsty era in NHL history but this never was a big deal. Could it be, might it be, it is! It's the pads that turned into weapons of mass destruction!!!


What happened in the 70's were fights. What's happening now has not once had anything to do with a fight. I miss the 70's style of hockey and bench brawls. They were far more entertaining than watching todays player lay unconscious and carted off on a stretcher. I guess they let men be real men back then. Hockey has become sissified.


Top
 Profile  
 
Van_Da_Man
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:54 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 2313
Location: Wisconsin
I think the instigator rule would help cut down on this head hunting crap, but the biggest problem now is the size of pads in general.

_________________
"Call a cop he robbed Delmore blind!!!"
Rick Jeanerette after Marty Biron's diving save back in 2000.

"I'm going to go to the spa and have a hot tub and massage and relax," Miller said. "That's it, and it's back to work tomorrow." Ryan Miller after clinching the North East division.


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:07 am 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
wow those refs are dumbasses.... I hope Drury will be ok. Screw Glencross... thats pathetic, who does that? Oh thats right scum bags... Glencross got what he deserved, a lot less if you ask me.

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
patkane88
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:23 am
Posts: 5129
Location: London, Ontario
When I heard Glencross I was mad for two reason, the first reason is why was Glencross suspended and not Chris Neil when Neil who hit Drury 10 times harder in the head two years ago? And the second reason is why was Mike Richards not suspended who was basically trying to knock Booth's head off?

I do not want to see drastic head injuries but come on!! If Glencross get 3 games for basically accidently running in to Drury then Richards should have gotten at least 3 or more for his hit on Booth, Colin Campbell needs to be more consistent with these kinds of hits.

_________________
just call me Brad

Twitter @BUrbanowicz13


Last edited by patkane88 on Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
icehound
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:07 am 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:27 pm
Posts: 3864
patkane88 wrote:
...Colin Campbell needs to be more consistent with these kinds of hits.


This. The NHL's standards are nothing, if not inconsistent.


Top
 Profile  
 
patkane88
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:11 am 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:23 am
Posts: 5129
Location: London, Ontario
icehound wrote:
patkane88 wrote:
...Colin Campbell needs to be more consistent with these kinds of hits.


This. The NHL's standards are nothing, if not inconsistent.


Very true.

_________________
just call me Brad

Twitter @BUrbanowicz13


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:49 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Let's take a basketball, an item that is decidedly softer and has more give than hockey shoulder pads.

If someone is hit in the right way in the head with this basketball, they can develop an epidural hematoma and die within a few hours.

Softer shoulder pads are good idea, but making sure that people don't use them as weapons is the more correct choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:49 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
Nah...you're a baby.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron