It is currently Wed May 27, 2026 7:37 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:46 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
I don't know what to say. I think a lot of this is ridiculous, especially when you can tell by the way they're playing who's putting in an effort and who isn't.

Clark may have slowed his scoring pace, but he's still noticeable out there. He's making things happen by using his speed.

Butler, while he has a poor +/- stat, seemingly isn't prone to giveaways. He's very good with the break out pass, he plays physical, and he's often playing against the top lines in the league.

If Vanek showed some movement (I haven't seen the Philly game at this point) and a little bit of heart out there, he wouldn't be on my shit list.

Does it partially have to do with his pay? Absolutely.

If you run a business, and you bring in a sales manager to increase your revenue and pay him royally, he better produce.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:51 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
I think the ZOMGPAYCHECK arguments are dying down now, and more rational heads are prevailing in regards to the Vanek hate - regardless of putting up points, he isn't showing the drive and passion he has in the past, and that's where most of the criticism has come from. And it is 100% justified.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:55 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
mechaphil wrote:
I think the ZOMGPAYCHECK arguments are dying down now, and more rational heads are prevailing in regards to the Vanek hate - regardless of putting up points, he isn't showing the drive and passion he has in the past, and that's where most of the criticism has come from. And it is 100% justified.


DING DING DING DING DING!
:text-goodpost:

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Sk8haggard9
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:37 pm 
Offline
Face-Off Specialist
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 627
Location: Hamburg, N.Y.
The sad thing is right now, if you replaced Vanek with Ennis, does anyone here really think the team gets worse?

Maybe I'm being overdramatic. But Vanek could probably bring back some decent peices in a trade too. Not that anyone would really want that 6.4 cap hit or whatever it is


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:43 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
mechaphil wrote:
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

On it boss.

2007: Sam Gagner (6th overall)
2008: Jordan Eberle (22nd overall)
2009: Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson (10th overall)
2010: TBD

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

On it boss.

2007: Sam Gagner (6th overall)
2008: Jordan Eberle (22nd overall)
2009: Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson (10th overall)
2010: TBD

Except for Eberle, I like the hell out of both of those. I know Gagner is doing pretty well, and Paajarvi (I can't do umlauts on my laptop :() looks to be one ridiculous powerplay quarterback.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Bauter88
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:51 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 1456
Easy Solution: Have Vanek talk to Ellis about work ethic... clone Ellis' brain.. put into vanek.

_________________
The Board Drunk.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:53 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Bauter88 wrote:
Easy Solution: Have Vanek talk to Ellis about work ethic... clone Ellis' brain.. put into vanek.

So crazy it just might work!"

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:03 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
mechaphil wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

On it boss.

2007: Sam Gagner (6th overall)
2008: Jordan Eberle (22nd overall)
2009: Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson (10th overall)
2010: TBD

Except for Eberle, I like the hell out of both of those. I know Gagner is doing pretty well, and Paajarvi (I can't do umlauts on my laptop :() looks to be one ridiculous powerplay quarterback.

The only thing I'm not sure on is, would we have gotten all of their 2007 first round draft picks or only one for each year. Because they had 3 first rounders in 2007.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:07 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Rules state that we would have gotten their first round pick for four years, so they would have kept the first round picks they acquired from other teams. The only one the Oilers would have coughed up is the one they owned in the first place.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:29 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

On it boss.

2007: Sam Gagner (6th overall)
2008: Jordan Eberle (22nd overall)
2009: Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson (10th overall)
2010: TBD

Except for Eberle, I like the hell out of both of those. I know Gagner is doing pretty well, and Paajarvi (I can't do umlauts on my laptop :() looks to be one ridiculous powerplay quarterback.

The only thing I'm not sure on is, would we have gotten all of their 2007 first round draft picks or only one for each year. Because they had 3 first rounders in 2007.

Would the Sabres have made the same picks or a player taken after that position in the draft, also, would Vanek being on the Oilers have altered their record enough to change those positions?

You cannot base any information on the potential draft picks with out the previous questions being answered and since the answers would be theoritical, its all a moot point. But hey, speculation is fun :)

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:32 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
slesh wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
Just for the record, I'd like someone to dig up the first round pick Edmonton chose for the last three season, just to see who we could have gotten if we let Edmonton take him.

On it boss.

2007: Sam Gagner (6th overall)
2008: Jordan Eberle (22nd overall)
2009: Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson (10th overall)
2010: TBD

Except for Eberle, I like the hell out of both of those. I know Gagner is doing pretty well, and Paajarvi (I can't do umlauts on my laptop :() looks to be one ridiculous powerplay quarterback.

The only thing I'm not sure on is, would we have gotten all of their 2007 first round draft picks or only one for each year. Because they had 3 first rounders in 2007.

Would the Sabres have made the same picks is the question.

Sam Gagner would have been a no brainer to pick up.

The 22nd pick could have been used for some more trade bait actually. The 10th pick, not totally sure if they would have picked him or not? Could have used both of our first rounds last year and traded up also.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:35 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Not necessarily Skyline, lets Buf trades both thier 1st round pick and Edmonton's 1st round pick with a 2nd and 3rd rounder for the NY Islanders 1st round pick (1st overall) this past draft. That drastically changes everything, we get Taveres, but no Myers. And so on. For every action there is a reaction.

Who really knows, we could have made the same deal the previous draft with Tampa and gotten Staimkos, think of that, Staimkos and Taveres on the Sabres.............Now this I like :)

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:35 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Hell yes speculation is fun

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:37 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
mechaphil wrote:
Hell yes speculation is fun

Hehehe I know, thats why I post about speculative trades by the Sabres, I like it too. :P

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
I didn't notice that at first slesh about not getting Myers.

But Stamkos is tearing it up right now.

Get rid of our first rounders this year to move up and grab Tavares would have been awesome. We would have had a higher first rounder also, and with the tenth from the Oilers, that is still a good pickup.

I think if we had let Vanek go, we would have had a higher pick in 2007 also. And in the top 10 overall. Good trade bait I would think. And if we wanted Myers that year we would have got him no matter what too.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:51 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
I didn't notice that at first slesh about not getting Myers.

But Stamkos is tearing it up right now.

Get rid of our first rounders this year to move up and grab Tavares would have been awesome. We would have had a higher first rounder also, and with the tenth from the Oilers, that is still a good pickup.

I think if we had let Vanek go, we would have had a higher pick in 2007 also. And in the top 10 overall. Good trade bait I would think. And if we wanted Myers that year we would have got him no matter what too.

Agreed Skyline, thats why when I was screaming for Buffalo to let Edmonton have him for the 4 1st round picks I wasn't Vanek hating, I was Sabres loving :mrgreen: .
I wish I were GM, I may fuck up, but hey, I think outside of the box, I may put together a team that runs with a core of guys that grab the cup 5 out of 10 years :dance: :dance: :dance:

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:55 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Yea slesh.

But you would have never known if the first overall pick would have been able to of been had from three first, and second and third though.

I think if we had let Vanek go and got Edmonton's firsts, the team would have a very solid core in place in about 4 more years, but we would have to endure a rebuilding phase right now still, and wouldn't have some of the offense and defense we have now though.

Also pure speculation, without Vanek of course.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Markus
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:10 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 1495
My problem is the way he plays. He simply isn't a threat. Without even mentioning his liability on defense, he just doesn't pose a threat for offense.

Now if you're a "casual" fan, and you just look at stats at the end of the season and don't actually watch the games, you'll say that he's not so bad.

I remember the Atlanta game this season. I was sitting in the Sabres shooting end and we were on the powerplay. Vanek is SITTING on the Thrasher's blue line while the THRASHERS are cycling the puck while WE are on the powerplay. He was booed...and a lot of the stands were yelling "oh Vanek you suck" dadada...Then all of a sudden, we get it to him on a perfect open net pass, and he scores.

Now it's "omg teh best player evar!"

He plays a game without a care in the world for his team, and only to pad his stats. That's it.

And now on offense...he only scores when he is force fed the goals. You or me could score those goals!

I'm not sure if he skates the entire length of the ice COMBINED in a single game. Players like Goose and Ellis skate it 100 times over.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron