Who am i?

i wont tell you. but i can say what ive seen.


ive seen a namesake of the third captain in person. at least that's what most think. a little nerdiness will reveal he's actually the thirteenth. the alphabet should turn a few gears in the mind.


The_Assassin does not wish to be caught, but (gender-neutral noun) does enjoy providing confusing clues.

The second captain served from 66-69, with stints in 79, 82, 84, 86, 89, and 91. A run cut short at first. And 89 was a disaster.

The third from 86-93, sharing a surname from that who I've seen. Stints too in 94, 96, 98, 02.

The first from 01-05. No stints. No one liked him much.

1) I don't know of any forum member with either of those surnames so I don't think that's it.
2) The chronological thing is bothering me The assassin said "The first from 01-05. No stints. No one liked him much" How do you have the first in 01-05, the second from 66-69 etc, and the third from 86-93 etc.?
3) I do agree that the evidence this is a Star Trek captain is overwhelming and that Picard or Stewart are probably correct.
4) There were two Picards - one for CBJ & one for the Sens - right?
5) Stewart, Anthony ATL -Stewart, Chris COL -Stewart, Gregory MTL

All of the above players are Canadian born. What about retired players?

6) The assassin owns Canes apparel. WHY?

Why is it so important to the assassin for us to know he has seen a certain captain? He never says he shares the name. Anyone who has seen a hockey game has seen a captain in person. Something doesn't seem to make sense as to the importance unless the assassin lives outside of NA in which case, it would be a very big deal to see a game.

The assassin is busy devising a clue that if solved, will be very, very clear.

If.

You better watch out!
Better not cry!
Better not pout!
I'm telling you why,
The assassin
Is coming to town

No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.

You better watch out!
Better not cry!
Better not pout!

So where's our clue, genius?

1) I don't know of any forum member with either of those surnames so I don't think that's it.
2) The chronological thing is bothering me The assassin said "The first from 01-05. No stints. No one liked him much" How do you have the first in 01-05, the second from 66-69 etc, and the third from 86-93 etc.?
3) I do agree that the evidence this is a Star Trek captain is overwhelming and that Picard or Stewart are probably correct.
4) There were two Picards - one for CBJ & one for the Sens - right?
5) Stewart, Anthony ATL -Stewart, Chris COL -Stewart, Gregory MTL

All of the above players are Canadian born. What about retired players?

6) The assassin owns Canes apparel. WHY?

Why is it so important to the assassin for us to know he has seen a certain captain? He never says he shares the name. Anyone who has seen a hockey game has seen a captain in person. Something doesn't seem to make sense as to the importance unless the assassin lives outside of NA in which case, it would be a very big deal to see a game.

look at what I bolded in #5

...

acrossthelines. Looking at this all, she hasn't been in this thread nearly as much as some of the past, and a lot of the writing style seems very similar to her. What throws me off is some of the misspellings, but maybe those were intentional?

acrossthelines. Looking at this all, she hasn't been in this thread nearly as much as some of the past, and a lot of the writing style seems very similar to her. What throws me off is some of the misspellings, but maybe those were intentional?