It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 8:58 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:09 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
SABRESAllTheWay wrote:
Squanto wrote:
slesh wrote:
[The United States of America, founded on christianity, should always maintain christianity to keep the country on the right track. Just an opinion.]


This in and of itself violates the principle of the First Amendment.

The government is not allowed to:
- Start or define a national religion
- Prefer one religion over another in any manner


To say that the US should 'maintain Christianity' is contrary to the establishment clauses of the First Amendment.

This is why I cringe everytime I hear a president say "god bless america"... they break the first ammendment EVERY TIME!


Then knock urself out and start saying Allah bless America... just because they say God bless America doesn't mean that they support any kinda religous vendetta... I mean come on... if saying anything in reference to God makes you cringe then dont say OH MY GOD! Even if it is in terms of swearing or not... your still referencing God... unless of course you dont mean too... which brings it back to the point of, Just cuz they say God Bless America doesnt mean they follow any kinda religion.... they are just saying it cuz it has always been said...

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:11 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
Hammygoodness wrote:
There are two clauses in the First Amendment that are relevant.

The Establishment Clause states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." This prohibits the government from creating a national religion. It says nothing about recognizing a religious holiday. It says nothing about government figures referencing God or their own personal religious beliefs.

The Free Exercise Clause states "Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]." This prohibits the government from interfering with the religious observance of its citizens.

The thing to keep in mind when reading the Constitution is that the framers mindset was one of fear of governmental power and control. The Constitution is written to restrict what the government can do to its people.

The term "separation of church and state" actually comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. In this letter, Jefferson was assuring the Danbury, Connecticut Baptists that the government could not interfere in their business.

So, in essence, the concept of the separation of church and state is actually a one-way street. Jefferson was saying the government must stay the fuck out of religion's business.

Ham

Thank you ham! I agree with everything you just wrote here... :clap: very well written

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
nnyfan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:51 pm 
Offline
Textbook Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:10 am
Posts: 484
Location: 1000 Islands
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
nnyfan wrote:
This thread is very sad...


why?



Let me rephrase that...this thread makes me very sad. It makes me sad to see such hatred against God, just because His existence can't be scientifically proven. If its such a myth...could so many gazillions of people be believing in a hoax all these thousands of years, worldwide? Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc all believe in God in their own ways. My faith in God has gotten me through so many tough times, it just makes me sad to see the hatred is all. God is my Father (I know, that sound so religious, but its how I feel) and see see the hatred for Him feels a lot like if you were on here going, "I just HATE when people start talking about how great Dick Burgess (my dad) is...I just hate that guy!" Seriously, that's how I feel about it. I pray lightly through the week when I think of something and profusely during church every Sunday and, although I respect your opinion regardign the subject, it makes me sad to hear it so vehemently. That's all.

Carry on...

_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:06 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
nnyfan wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
nnyfan wrote:
This thread is very sad...


why?



Let me rephrase that...this thread makes me very sad. It makes me sad to see such hatred against God, just because His existence can't be scientifically proven. If its such a myth...could so many gazillions of people be believing in a hoax all these thousands of years, worldwide? Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc all believe in God in their own ways. My faith in God has gotten me through so many tough times, it just makes me sad to see the hatred is all. God is my Father (I know, that sound so religious, but its how I feel) and see see the hatred for Him feels a lot like if you were on here going, "I just HATE when people start talking about how great Dick Burgess (my dad) is...I just hate that guy!" Seriously, that's how I feel about it. I pray lightly through the week when I think of something and profusely during church every Sunday and, although I respect your opinion regardign the subject, it makes me sad to hear it so vehemently. That's all.

Carry on...


I completely agree with you, its true people say God doesnt exist cuz we can't prove it scientifically, well, what if God doesnt want to be found by our scientific methods? Wouldnt that just weaken him? If we did find him, then people would prolly say "What kinda God is this? that he cant even mask himself from our scientific methods?" Well it seems that people who are skeptical of God it goes both ways, if he doesnt reveal himself you say, he cant exist or we would find him, but if they could find him they would say that he isnt a real powerful God cuz he cant even hide from us if he wanted too.... it goes both ways, and you guys just cant be wrong? idk, thats how I see it

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:13 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
nnyfan wrote:
Let me rephrase that...this thread makes me very sad. It makes me sad to see such hatred against God, just because His existence can't be scientifically proven.


Questioning the existence or non-existence of a supreme being shouldn't be interpreted as 'hating' that being. It's just a question. Some people can accept the dogma of a faith on it's face, others have to question it and decide for themselves how they believe.

Doesn't make anyone right or wrong, just makes them people.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Squanto wrote:
nnyfan wrote:
Let me rephrase that...this thread makes me very sad. It makes me sad to see such hatred against God, just because His existence can't be scientifically proven.


Questioning the existence or non-existence of a supreme being shouldn't be interpreted as 'hating' that being. It's just a question. Some people can accept the dogma of a faith on it's face, others have to question it and decide for themselves how they believe.

Doesn't make anyone right or wrong, just makes them people.


Some would reason that any higher power would be proud of such inquisitiveness, using the intelligence they gifted us with so to speak. Questions don't necessarily indicate a lack of faith. I think it's natural to seek answers about the unknown.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:28 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Personally I don't think that religion is a hoax. What really bothers me is that it seems that every major religion is adamant that they've got it absolutely right.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:49 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Personally I don't think that religion is a hoax. What really bothers me is that it seems that every major religion is adamant that they've got it absolutely right.



Ah but the three MAJOR religions think they have it right because they all Believe their God is the supreme and only God... BUT


Christianity, Islam, and Jews all have the "same" God, with just slightly different ideas of what the Almighty wants.

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:54 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Rutledge222 wrote:
Christianity, Islam, and Jews all have the "same" God, with just slightly different ideas of what the Almighty wants.


I think that if you look deeper, you'll find that those three religions have some pretty significant differences between their concepts of a supreme being.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:55 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
End The Curse wrote:
If you combine church and state you'll fuck up both church and state.


This. I'm sick of the discussion about separation of church and state.

Here's an easy way to separate them; politicians can stop fucking talking about it, and people can stop complaining when someone wants to say a prayer.

You don't have to take part if you don't want to. Don't get your fucking panties in a bunch.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:58 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
Squanto wrote:
Rutledge222 wrote:
Christianity, Islam, and Jews all have the "same" God, with just slightly different ideas of what the Almighty wants.


I think that if you look deeper, you'll find that those three religions have some pretty significant differences between their concepts of a supreme being.



I know all three religions have major differences about what they believe God wants... but if you look, we all have the same "god".

Christianity and Jewish customs believe that Jesus existed and was a prophet of God, but Jews dont believe Jesus was the son of God, like Chrisitans do, they believe that the prophecy has yet to come true...

Islam, has the prophet Muhammed from the god Allah, they believe that yes Jesus existed and was a prophet for Allah, and yes he died for his beliefs but he was not the son of Allah, so yes they are connected, but the three religions have different perceptions of what God wants,

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:07 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
The Abrahamic religions have similar viewpoints on the nature of a supreme being, but even they differ enough that it's unfair to lump them all together.

However, beyond the 'big three' , there are countless other religions that look at a supreme being much differently than the Abrahamic ones. Some of those ideas about a supreme being are nothing like what what Christianity, Islam, and Judaism think.


Top
 Profile  
 
Chrismillah(spazo)
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:18 pm 
Offline
Career AHL'er
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:14 am
Posts: 192
Hammygoodness wrote:
There are two clauses in the First Amendment that are relevant.

The Establishment Clause states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." This prohibits the government from creating a national religion. It says nothing about recognizing a religious holiday. It says nothing about government figures referencing God or their own personal religious beliefs.

The Free Exercise Clause states "Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]." This prohibits the government from interfering with the religious observance of its citizens.

The thing to keep in mind when reading the Constitution is that the framers mindset was one of fear of governmental power and control. The Constitution is written to restrict what the government can do to its people.

The term "separation of church and state" actually comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. In this letter, Jefferson was assuring the Danbury, Connecticut Baptists that the government could not interfere in their business.

So, in essence, the concept of the separation of church and state is actually a one-way street. Jefferson was saying the government must stay the fuck out of religion's business.

Ham

I agree with this completely. The religious restrictions were made to protect the church from the state not the state from the church.

_________________
Image

Norcal's #1 Sabres fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
nnyfan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:25 pm 
Offline
Textbook Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:10 am
Posts: 484
Location: 1000 Islands
Chrismillah(spazo) wrote:
Hammygoodness wrote:
There are two clauses in the First Amendment that are relevant.

The Establishment Clause states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." This prohibits the government from creating a national religion. It says nothing about recognizing a religious holiday. It says nothing about government figures referencing God or their own personal religious beliefs.

The Free Exercise Clause states "Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]." This prohibits the government from interfering with the religious observance of its citizens.

The thing to keep in mind when reading the Constitution is that the framers mindset was one of fear of governmental power and control. The Constitution is written to restrict what the government can do to its people.

The term "separation of church and state" actually comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. In this letter, Jefferson was assuring the Danbury, Connecticut Baptists that the government could not interfere in their business.

So, in essence, the concept of the separation of church and state is actually a one-way street. Jefferson was saying the government must stay the fuck out of religion's business.

Ham

I agree with this completely. The religious restrictions were made to protect the church from the state not the state from the church.

:clap:

As in, take the Henry VIII era. His daugher, Queen Mary, was known as Bloody Mary because of her vicious treatment of protestants. Then along came Elizabeth, who was protestant and God help you if you were Catholic (although, I don't think she was as vicious as Mary). Separation of church and state was meant to stop this, which is the very core of what the pilgrims were running away from in the first place...

_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
nnyfan
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:31 pm 
Offline
Textbook Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:10 am
Posts: 484
Location: 1000 Islands
Seriously, can you imagine if it were still like that? "Okay, Mary is Queen...I guess we're all Catholic now...hide the protestant books! ITS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!" Mary dies and Elizabeth is Queen. "Hide the Catholic books and where did we put those friggen Protestant books?" Imagine if you were atheist? They'd take you to the 'edge of the planet' and throw you off into space! We live in a time that is, really, so tolerant of everyone's differences and opinions....WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:58 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
Squanto wrote:
The Abrahamic religions have similar viewpoints on the nature of a supreme being, but even they differ enough that it's unfair to lump them all together.

However, beyond the 'big three' , there are countless other religions that look at a supreme being much differently than the Abrahamic ones. Some of those ideas about a supreme being are nothing like what what Christianity, Islam, and Judaism think.



Well by similar view points they believe we have different Gods but in reality if you go all the way back to the origins is technically the same God with different names.... sorry thats just what I found.... your perfectly welcome to disagree :) but... thats just how I see it

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:06 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
I think I will have another drink.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Rutledge222 wrote:
Squanto wrote:
The Abrahamic religions have similar viewpoints on the nature of a supreme being, but even they differ enough that it's unfair to lump them all together.

However, beyond the 'big three' , there are countless other religions that look at a supreme being much differently than the Abrahamic ones. Some of those ideas about a supreme being are nothing like what what Christianity, Islam, and Judaism think.



Well by similar view points they believe we have different Gods but in reality if you go all the way back to the origins is technically the same God with different names.... sorry thats just what I found.... your perfectly welcome to disagree :) but... thats just how I see it


or multiple gods

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:08 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Good job Ham, the letter you speak of only gives clarity to the Establishment Clause, but has absolutely nothing to do with the original post, which was on the recognition and subsequent celebration at the Federal Level.

The establishment clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference of one religion over another or the support of a religious idea with no identifiable secular purpose. The first approach is called the "separationist" or "no aid" interpretation, while the second approach is called the "non-preferentialist" or "accommodationist" interpretation. The accommodationist interpretation prohibits Congress from preferring one religion over another, but does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

Now, if you dig deeper, what will you find? Heres a hint, look to the Supreme Court of the United States of America, find their court rulings on this.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:34 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
From George Washington's hand, on the Treaty of Tripoli, I present:

"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: