It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 4:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:36 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Squanto wrote:
It sets them up with a platform for the midterms in 2010, while keeping those insurance company donations flowing.

Have you noticed how everything that has a start or end date in this legislation, the war in Afghanistan etc. all happen in 2012?
Interesting that we wouldn't see the pain and true cost of this health care plan until after the next presidential election.
Which brings up another obvious question no one is asking....why have Democrats been setting vote deadlines for this massive bill? First it was august, then thanksgiving, now it's Christmas....the damn thing doesn't start until 2014 but we need to pass it tomorrow.
Doesn't pass the sniff test.
Quote:
I truly feel that (in Congress) the Democrats are actually interested in health care reform, while Republicans are interested in nothing of the sort. That's what frustrates me most.

Again....if Democrats had their collective act together, Republicans aren't even in this equation.
Don't blame the opposition for opposing. Republicans have put forth several alternate bills that were never allowed to leave the authors desk.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:51 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Hammygoodness wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
And yet the Republicans are screaming and crying that Obama should stop wasting time on health care and focus more on jobs. When he does, their reaction is the same...stall, lie, and vote as a block like the mindless sheep they are to block ANYTHING the president proposes.

You do realize that the Republicans in neither the House nor the Senate have the votes to stop anything. The Lord knows I've been so disgustingly disappointed in the Republicans in most of what they do. Doing whatever they can to stop some of the current legislation is one of the few things I'll applaud them for.

Ham

Perhaps this is the new model for our government. Don't actually try to legislate. Don't recognize the will of the voters when they elect the other party. Just stall and block ANYTHING proposed by the other party.

It is far easier to burn down a barn than it is to build one.

Is that what I should expect my Democratic representatives to do when the GOP is once again in control (as they surely will be some day)?

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
I'm sorry the party on your side of the issues are so scatterbrained they don't know how to lead once they gain power.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:09 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Democrats generally try to incorporate some of the ideas of the opposition party, and that becomes their downfall because they either take too long, don't get anything done, or pass something watered down to try and please everyone.

Republicans will stand united on an issue and jam it through, even when they're totally wrong in what they are doing. Sometimes admirable, sometimes not.

I tend to side with the Democrats because I think that they're more often than not trying to do the right thing, even when they fuck it up, and because I don't like the way most Republicans play politics.

At the end of the day it matters not. None of these elected officials do what's in the best interests of their constituents or the nation. They all do what's needed to re-elect themselves, or keep those donations rolling.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:16 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Squanto wrote:
Democrats generally try to incorporate some of the ideas of the opposition party.

I've seen very little evidence of that lately.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:19 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Crosscheck wrote:
I've seen very little evidence of that lately.


Tax cuts (the Repub answer for seemingly everything) that the Dems didn't want were put into the economic stimulus bill.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:42 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Squanto wrote:

Tax cuts (the Repub answer for seemingly everything) that the Dems didn't want were put into the economic stimulus bill.

That was for blue dogs (once again, having to compromise to get their own party on board)...not Republicans.

How's that stimulus working out BTW? Personally I'm glad national unemployment didn't go over 8%.

The President and Congress talked to the experts and really nailed that one.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 6:47 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Crosscheck wrote:
Too bad it would take 15 years of environmental impact reports and eminent domain lawsuits before all those ideas got rejected.

Actually xcheck, all of the studies are already complete. Samuel Engineering out of Colorado did a good portion of them back around the turn of the century. Warren Buffet wasn't dumb, knowing this project is seriously being considered he went and bought Burlington Railroad, who happens to own 72% of the existing railroad tracks and runs west of Chicago.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:11 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
slesh wrote:
Crosscheck wrote:
Too bad it would take 15 years of environmental impact reports and eminent domain lawsuits before all those ideas got rejected.

Actually xcheck, all of the studies are already complete. Samuel Engineering out of Colorado did a good portion of them back around the turn of the century. Warren Buffet wasn't dumb, knowing this project is seriously being considered he went and bought Burlington Railroad, who happens to own 72% of the existing railroad tracks and runs west of Chicago.

Well, I'll believe it when I see it I guess....call me a pessimist ;)
People have wanted high speed rail all over California and Nevada for decades and nothing has actually been done.
There's even bond money waiting to build it here in California.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Yes! Green Party, not part of the problem!

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:46 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Yes! Green Party, not part of the problem!

I don't know Criminal, this project is high on the list with Obama, but, xcheck is right in a way, and I think he knows how.
There isn't enough private investment money to tally up to 20+ trillion, this is bad, just plain bad. If it goes on government funding it would be no different than Amtrak. I wouldn't mind seeing it get done, but I would prefer private enterprise over public control. Just my thoughts though, I actually have no idea how they plan to implement this, it could be 1 run at a time, taking forever to build out.

The reason I even mentioned it was because Irony had a great thought on how to bring the nation out of recession through employment and he is correct, we do need a major infrastructure overhaul.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: