It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 6:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Should tax money be used via a public option to fund abortion procedures?
Yes, it's a woman's health issue. 52%  52%  [ 11 ]
No, the religious and moral views of all tax payers must be respected. 48%  48%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 21
Author Message
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:05 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
To the condom/Plan B argument...it all goes back to when a new "life" begins. Scientifically, (and I may be wrong), does the zygote formed at contraception not have different DNA than the parent? If so, then it is a new life (some would argue it is a parasite, which I wouldn't argue against :P ) . Sometimes though, birth controls fail, condoms break, hormones aren't shoved out of whack as expected, etc...and an "oopsies" happens. What then?

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:15 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Science still can't tell us when life begins...that's the crux of the problem.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:30 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
Science still can't tell us when life begins...that's the crux of the problem.

I think there is little debate that an embryo, even in the first few minutes after conception, is life, but is it human? Certainly, it has the potential to become human, but what it means to be human is something I believe science will never be able to define, because of the subjectivity of the question.

The same problem exists at the other end of the life cycle. When is someone dead? When the heart stops? When there is no longer brain function? When there is no possibility of revival? When a person cannot live on their own without life support?

It is a subjective question, as is the same question of when we actually become human. The Catholic Church used to adopt the postion that a person became a person when the body became inhabited by a soul, which they believed happened when the mother could feel the "quickening" (movement). Now, apparently (given their ridiculous position on birth control), we are human in the sperm.

This is an interesting philosophical discussion, but you all know where it is going to lead to, right? Abortion is not a topic that can be rationally examined on the internet (or most anywhere else, for that matter).

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:30 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
This is an interesting philosophical discussion, but you all know where it is going to lead to, right? Abortion is not a topic that can be rationally examined on the internet (or most anywhere else, for that matter).

Man you've got that right....
That's why I specified science doesn't have the answer. It's all based on an individuals faith or belief system and arguing those things can get ugly quickly.

Although I suppose I appreciate the passion behind the entire abortion debate and politics. We are talking about life and death after all.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Montalo
PostPosted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:49 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:09 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Buffalo, NY
Captain Pants wrote:
Montalo wrote:
im very prolife, just to establish that
murder is murder is murder

but

the women are choosing to murder their unborn children, and i should not have to pay for that, or any other elective medical procedure

if i want to have LASIK, then i fully expect to have to pay for it 100%


Not everyone thinks its 'murder'. Knowing you, condoms are murder too aren't they?

i, in following with the Church's teachings, oppose any and all artifical forms of birth control

also, zilla, a question from you i never answer

you posed the question, if i remember correctly, if a man shoots and kills a pregnant woman, should he be charged with two counts of murder

the answer is yes, he should be

_________________
PSA: I am an overly sarcastic person. If you take me at my word, then i will most likely anger and offend you.


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:08 am 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
I think maybe murder is a bad word, I'll explain. Murder is illegal because it's something you wouldn't want done to you. Society said, "let's make that a severe crime, and penalize it harshly". I think that's the general thingy there. Abortion isn't "something you wouldn't want done to you" because you weren't even born yet. While I consider killing a baby to be the most heinous of all murders, aborting an embryo just isn't murder, imho of course. The topic may be getting too close to the abortion discussion though. If it gets too close, I guess the mods will mod though.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:39 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Well, the definition of murder comes into play in this subject. Murder is the killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

If you believe that a human being starts to exist at conception, you probably believe abortion is murder.

If you believe that a human being starts to exist at birth, you probably don't.

I agree that we should probably turn the subject away from the sides of the abortion debate, as in this format it's bound to not end well.


Top
 Profile  
 
Hammygoodness
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:34 am 
Offline
More Heart Than Skill
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:07 am
Posts: 2030
Location: Ilion, NY
Godzilla1960 wrote:
The Catholic Church used to adopt the postion that a person became a person when the body became inhabited by a soul, which they believed happened when the mother could feel the "quickening" (movement). Now, apparently (given their ridiculous position on birth control), we are human in the sperm.

I believe this is erroneous, but I'd have to check the Catechism. I'm fairly certain the Catholic Church is not against birth control because they believe sperm to be a person. Two separate topics.

Ham

_________________
Do you believe yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:24 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Uhm, I'm pretty sure the Pope decreed that the only acceptable use of contraceptives (more specifically, condoms) was to combat the spread of AIDS and that's it. And we all know the guy in the big "dunce" cap is the dude who makes the rules.

So, yea, the Church is against birth control.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Hammygoodness
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:56 pm 
Offline
More Heart Than Skill
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:07 am
Posts: 2030
Location: Ilion, NY
No, I didn't say the Catholic Church wasn't against birth control. I know they are. I'm saying their reasoning is NOT along the lines of a sperm being a person. Didn't make it too clear in my original statement.

Ham

_________________
Do you believe yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:57 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Ohhhhh, yea I read that wrong. My bads.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Captain Pants
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:04 am 
Offline
Brawler
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:57 am
Posts: 342
mechaphil wrote:
Uhm, I'm pretty sure the Pope decreed that the only acceptable use of contraceptives (more specifically, condoms) was to combat the spread of AIDS and that's it. And we all know the guy in the big "dunce" cap is the dude who makes the rules.

So, yea, the Church is against birth control.

If only that were true.

Quote:
Pope Benedict XVI said on his way to Africa Tuesday that condoms were not the answer in the continent's fight against HIV, his first explicit statement on an issue that has divided even clergy working with AIDS patients.

"You can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms," the pope told reporters aboard the Alitalia plane headed to Yaounde, Cameroon, where he will begin a seven-day pilgrimage on the continent. "On the contrary, it increases the problem."

Condoms apparently makes aids worse! We should tell people to ignore their natural human urges and discourage education.

It's disgusting to see how the pope is responsible for so many deaths. Telling people not to use condoms... crazy

Image

_________________
When I was a boy I spoke as a boy, I understood as a boy, and I thought as a boy; when I became a man I took that boy outside and shot him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Captain Pants
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:16 am 
Offline
Brawler
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:57 am
Posts: 342
Montalo wrote:
Captain Pants wrote:
Montalo wrote:
im very prolife, just to establish that
murder is murder is murder

but

the women are choosing to murder their unborn children, and i should not have to pay for that, or any other elective medical procedure

if i want to have LASIK, then i fully expect to have to pay for it 100%


Not everyone thinks its 'murder'. Knowing you, condoms are murder too aren't they?

i, in following with the Church's teachings, oppose any and all artifical forms of birth control

also, zilla, a question from you i never answer

you posed the question, if i remember correctly, if a man shoots and kills a pregnant woman, should he be charged with two counts of murder

the answer is yes, he should be


question, do you think for yourself ever when making decisions or just turn to your book?

it's a legitimate question, don't freak out people

_________________
When I was a boy I spoke as a boy, I understood as a boy, and I thought as a boy; when I became a man I took that boy outside and shot him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Pope Benedict XVI has signed a decree moving Pope Pious XII closer to sainthood. Pious XII was pope during the 1930s and 40s who ignored the Nazi holocaust of the Jewish people, claiming that the Church had to maintain neutrality.

Jesus turned water into wine, but apparently now all you have to do to become a saint in the Catholic Church is sit by while the Nazis turned people into ashes.

I think it is a legitimate question to ask, given their silence during the holocaust, their policies on birth control in an overcrowded world, their long history of intolerance and autrocities, as well as their coverup of sex abuse scandals around the globe, if the Catholic Church has been more a force of good or of evil in the world.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
To be honest, no one really knew the extent of the holocaust until WWII was almost over.

EDIT: I'm not defending anything...just saying it was a shock to everyone when it was discovered...it's not like the Catholic church said "go ahead and kill all those Jews".

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:45 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
My take on it is fairly simple.

The actual events of what really happened in the lives of those figures talked about in religious texts have been clouded by 2000+ years of history. Nobody now can accurately say what those figures actually said, let along try and decide what they MEANT.

To me, it's disingenuous for any church to interpret these two thousand year old writings that have been translated and retranslated thousands of times to make hard rules and say they're religious canon.


Top
 Profile  
 
adambuffalo
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:59 pm 
Offline
First Rounder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:37 am
Posts: 110
I voted yes. I am prochoice, however, if I was in the position of having to decide I would choose everytime to keep it. I do think that abortions should be funded. I would rather pay for a procedure now than have to pay for welfare, food stamps and the other tax payers dollars that go to people who have kids and don't have the means or ambition to take care of them. I don't know the numbers or anything, but I would guess the majority of people who get abortions or who would have gotten one if the could have afforded it, are people who don't deserve or are unable to provide for a child.

_________________
We were biting this morning. We were biting this morning.


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:14 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
Squanto wrote:
To me, it's disingenuous for any church to interpret these two thousand year old writings

Actually, the writings are 1800-900 years old, and the history is 2000 years old, not to mention they have been interpreted and edited a few thousand times over the 1900 years. That leaves 100 years of word of mouth in an age of idiocy. This doesn't seem to bother anyone of belief though. Why?, because it's all about believing anyways. Sort of like I did with Santa Claus for a few years. Sorry if this is taken wrong by some people, but I always deal with things rationally. It's how "I" cope. If "you" choose to cope through faith, fine. I have no problem with that, so please don't have a problem with me for mine.

Also, churches aren't even 1900 years old. They were started a few hundred years after the writings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: