It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 2:00 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
icehound
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:24 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:27 pm
Posts: 3864
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Mike Robitaille said it best on the post game show the other day. Realistically, you won't get 3 solid periods out of a hockey team. Typically, the team that wins is the one that controls the game for 40 minutes...


How many teams get outshot 20-1 or 20-2 or 20-4 regularly, in any given period? The Sabres do this regularly.

I'm not suggesting that they put forth a "bionic" effort and each and all of them skate, "balls-to-the-wall", for 60 minutes. Not at all - That would be an impossibility.

But, when the shot-differential is 20 to a handful, regularly?

Take Miller out of the equation, and this team's effort reflects a team that isn't even in the playoffs. Sure, the Sabres are second in the conference and first in the division, but if you think it's a non-issue - That this is what has allowed them to get there. That, with any other goalie we wouldn't be breaking out the torches and pitchforks?

Then, you're mistaken. It's a very grave issue that they been allowed to ignore, precisely because he's allowed them to get away with it, yawn, stretch their arms, and wake up in time to play for one period, and win.

With any other goalie, right now, this team would be in 9th place. This is a team that has actually lost games 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 behind 40-stop performances by Miller.

This is a nightmare waiting to happen. It really needs to be addressed.

It's nice to have a goalie stand on his head, and give you a chance to compete and possibly win - It's another, to come out every night and expect it; to take it for granted and just play with your cock for two-thirds of the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
Nuthatch
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 593
icehound wrote:

I have advocated the potentially disruptive practice of waiving or trading a key component - a ringleader, if you will - to send a shockwave through the clubhouse. And have focused primarily on Connolly as being the one who sets the standard and acts as the greatest example for inconsistency, fanciness, listlessness and stubborn arrogance for such players as Roy, Stafford, Pominville and perhaps Vanek.

But, that's just me - Suggesting a pre-emptive strike to put an end to the nonsense. Time will tell how this all plays out.

For me, it's never been about whether they win or lose - But, HOW they win or lose. And it's always seemed that the most talented have always hurt the team-effort with their "individualism".


This makes me feel kind of sad, in a 'this really is starting to make sense' fashion. Find the ringleader and get him gone. Somebody 'important' sits, and the team plays better? Stafford seems to have potential seeing that he reacted positively to his benching. Pommanville, well, isn't he the one with the new baby? It may not be a good excuse, but it sure could be a reason for his uninspired (tired?) play. Any husband worth his salt will pitch in when he gets home. Not saying this is the case here, but it might be. Even Hecht seems to be having a resurgance- perhaps last year he gave up fighting the locker room's lazy energy? I agree with the thought to give Grier the A. He certainly deserves it. I'd like to think that he & Rivet are on the same page.

I guess I have convinced myself that its time for someone to go. Based on the way they approach practices, team meetings and games themselves, someone must be removed from the team. I'd rather have a lesser player with a good work ethic than a star with none. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
jvaccaro6
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
Certifiably Hotter than ETC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 3689
Where is our "C" Craig Rivet in all of this?

Something to ponder...

_________________
"She's like plan C after an 18 pack"

Squanto 7/27/2010


Top
 Profile  
 
freshtracks
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
Rink Rat

Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:49 pm
Posts: 27
Seems like an awful lot of negativity going around for a team that's in 2nd place in the Eastern Conference.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
I know the team fell behind against Pittsburgh (although that was, in all honesty, Miller's fault) and they were toe-to-toe against St. Louis, and I know he scored the winning goal last night against Atlanta (assists to wacky end glass and Tyler Myers), but Roy is the source of this fancy-pants shenanigans, IMO.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
icehound wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Mike Robitaille said it best on the post game show the other day. Realistically, you won't get 3 solid periods out of a hockey team. Typically, the team that wins is the one that controls the game for 40 minutes...


How many teams get outshot 20-1 or 20-2 or 20-4 regularly, in any given period? The Sabres do this regularly.

I'm not suggesting that they put forth a "bionic" effort and each and all of them skate, "balls-to-the-wall", for 60 minutes. Not at all - That would be an impossibility.

But, when the shot-differential is 20 to a handful, regularly?

Take Miller out of the equation, and this team's effort reflects a team that isn't even in the playoffs. Sure, the Sabres are second in the conference and first in the division, but if you think it's a non-issue - That this is what has allowed them to get there. That, with any other goalie we wouldn't be breaking out the torches and pitchforks?

Then, you're mistaken. It's a very grave issue that they been allowed to ignore, precisely because he's allowed them to get away with, yawn, stretch their arms, and wake up in time to play for one period, and win.

With any other goalie, right now, this team would be in 9th place. This is a team that has actually lost games 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 behind 40-stop performaces by Miller.

This is a nightmare waiting to happen. It really needs to be addressed.

It's nice to have a goalie stand on his head, and give you a chance to compete and possibly win - It's another, to come out every night and expect it; to take it for granted and just play with your cock for two-thirds of the game.


Regularly?

I'd be willing to bet that you couldn't find more than 8 games this season by which this team has had a shot differential of more than 10 in any one period.

Many of those situations I recall being circumstances by which we've spent most of the period in the penalty box, and that has contributed.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:04 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
obviously Miller is seeing something that has him very concerned. Hopefully a tongue lashing from him will be enough to make these guys see the error of their ways...

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:23 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Sending anyone down to Portland would be a terrible idea. Put Roy and Connolly in a place where they regularly CAN skate through three guys on their own won't dissuade them from that behavior, it will reinforce it.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo Slice
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:26 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 2708
Awesome. Glad Miller is finally letting them know that he won't bail them out every single game.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:28 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Sending anyone down to Portland would be a terrible idea. Put Roy and Connolly in a place where they regularly CAN skate through three guys on their own won't dissuade them from that behavior, it will reinforce it.

I would think the embarrassment of getting sent to the minors would make them realize that Lindy was serious. Obviously they think they're shit don't stink so they can do whatever they want since there is no real consequences.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
Timbo Slice wrote:
Awesome. Glad Miller is finally letting them know that he won't bail them out every single game.

He will keep bailing them out because that's what an elite goalie does. He's just tired of doing it when he is one of the only ones that show up in the first period lately

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Bauter88
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:00 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 1456
We won the game. We need to play better D. We will play better D. Connolly, Roy, and Pommers are playing fine.. yell at Vanek. Watch us win the next game and then bitch again.

_________________
The Board Drunk.


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
Hey PSP, our top "six" fucking suck. Our highest goal scorer has 11 goals... Lowest for top goal scorer on a team in the league...

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
They play a much more controlled defensive system now...if they continued to play a wide-open system, then they'd score more. Jesus, how hard is it to realize that.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:18 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
BlueandYellow wrote:
Hey PSP, our top "six" fucking suck. Our highest goal scorer has 11 goals... Lowest for top goal scorer on a team in the league...


So what. Would you rather have one guy teams can key on and shut down, or everyone scoring?

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
jordano
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:58 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Calgary, Alberta
jvaccaro6 wrote:
Where is our "C" Craig Rivet in all of this?

Something to ponder...

After so many things said here I decided to respond to this.

Neither you or I know why Rivet got the 'C' but what we do know is he never got it for his offensive leadership or anything like that. Therefore, I'm suggesting that Rivet has the 'C' for his dressing room abilities.

We can't shit on Rivet because we have no idea what happens behind closed doors.

_________________
I am, you know I am. I am Canadian.
#1 Hockey Nation.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
I do know that I'm sick and damn tired that Rivet keeps taking dumb penalties, can't keep up with offending players, is consistently caught flat-footed, and can't skate to save his life any more. If it is his locker room ability that has him wearing the C, then he isn't very good at it if Miller is the one who has to snap on the club to get them to wake up.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
I think that rah-rah speeches in the locker room - whether inspirational or ass-chewing - only last for so long (about a period or two). If these guys haven't found the motivation to win the Stanley Cup within, then no speeches by Ryan Miller are going to give them that motivation over the course of a season.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
jordano wrote:
Neither you or I know why Rivet got the 'C'

I'm guessing that the Sabres locker room is so devoid of natural leaders that they instantly all agreed, 'hey, give the "C" to the new guy, yea, let's make Rivet the captain.'

This is no slam on the Sabres. They have a lot of talent, but being a leader is not an easy thing. It takes both training and a certain amount of natural ability. These guys just aren't strong on leadership qualities. They are a group of typical young guys who are proficient in hockey skills, but lacking in leadership ability, looking for someone to take charge.

That is probably where we miss Drury the most.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:41 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
We won three straight games, and in two of them came back from 3 goals down.

Our goalies are suppose to keep teams in the game, it's their job. The team just needs to buckle down a bit more to not leave them out to dry and not fall into holes.

We have one of the best goalies in the league, the team knows this but their attitude needs to change a bit with him instead of relying on him as much.

We're second in the conference because of Miller, and our multiple guys scoring goals. We're in the middle of the league in scoring, and 5th in goals against.

The team is winning, even if winning in bad ways, it shows signs of a mature team and one who won't give up in the end and keep pushing to win.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: