Not shocking in the least, though I think it's a bit much to be considering Myers for the Norris.

I am not sure, though, if it's that in my mind he's not worthy, or if it's that because he's a rookie I think it's too early, even though he is deserving. I do believe, though, that it's split in the middle when it comes to those scenarios for those who don't think he should be nominated, though the latter is mostly subconscious and goes largely unnoticed by most people who consider it. The fact that he is a rookie has been stated in a lot of posts on HFboards, for example, from those arguing against a potential nomination for him. They also mention that others such as Keith are more deserving, but the fact that that he's a rookie is brought up as often as it is in those discussions gives me pause.
I hope the kid can keep it up.
As for Miller, he should be a lock for the Vezina and the Hart.