It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 3:40 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
ennis might be a highly rated prospect, but from everything ive ever heard, he is a one-dimensional player who only and always thinks offense offense offense.


Again, compared to MacArthur, who is -12.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
BS1970
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:47 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:19 pm
Posts: 2006
Location: Banner Elk, NC
Surprised no one has said it, but Vanek. He is a great player, and can be a lethal scorer. I would love it though if we got rid of him for someone that is more defensively responsible and isn't always half assing. We have enough scoring going around on the 4 lines on this team with him being a ghost that we know it wouldn't be a devastating loss if we traded him. In fact, it could make this team better because we could get someone that actually busts their hump for this team and can actually be on the ice for more than 30 seconds without being winded.

I don't wanna see Butler gone, but I think we should send him back down to Portland for some time to get back in the groove of things and hope he can make a resurgence and be the player he was last year. I in no way see him as a bust yet, just having a sophomore slump is all.

And the usual suspects:
-Stafford
-Roy
-MacArthur
-Lalime

If Tallinder or Lydman are resigned or traded, I wouldn't be devastated, but wouldn't mind seeing one of them resigned.

_________________
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." ~ Han Solo

Image Image
We truly are not worthy of Miller!


Top
 Profile  
 
Howie Hodge
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:09 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 3962
Location: Depew
I'd love to have Dion here. His game has dropped off the last couple seasons, and I think a change of scenery is in order.

Again; he doesn't fit in here, salary cap wise, without moving a sizable contract. Pominville probably provides them with part of what they're looking for. They'd want something else, prospect wise, or draft pick wise to make this even a remote possibility.

_________________
"I'll rap you with my cane; you pencil necked geek!!"

-Bowler, imitating Freddy Blassie, at the very first M & G.


Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo Slice
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:58 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 2708
BS1970 wrote:
Surprised no one has said it, but Vanek. He is a great player, and can be a lethal scorer. I would love it though if we got rid of him for someone that is more defensively responsible and isn't always half assing. We have enough scoring going around on the 4 lines on this team with him being a ghost that we know it wouldn't be a devastating loss if we traded him. In fact, it could make this team better because we could get someone that actually busts their hump for this team and can actually be on the ice for more than 30 seconds without being winded.

I don't wanna see Butler gone, but I think we should send him back down to Portland for some time to get back in the groove of things and hope he can make a resurgence and be the player he was last year. I in no way see him as a bust yet, just having a sophomore slump is all.

And the usual suspects:
-Stafford
-Roy
-MacArthur
-Lalime

If Tallinder or Lydman are resigned or traded, I wouldn't be devastated, but wouldn't mind seeing one of them resigned.


That's an interesting though about Vanek. If we could get a big return for him, then totally.

Of course, it's not realistic at all. I highly doubt Darcy would even think about moving Vanek.


Top
 Profile  
 
Howie Hodge
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:02 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 3962
Location: Depew
I highly doubt that Vanek, at his salary, is an attractive acquisition for teams. Like him or not; he is underperforming on his contract.

_________________
"I'll rap you with my cane; you pencil necked geek!!"

-Bowler, imitating Freddy Blassie, at the very first M & G.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:07 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Vanek won't leave, plus hes been doing some very big hitting and playing much more sound defense than people make it out to be.

The Vancouver game he did a few stick lifts and stole the puck, and a few games before he landed some hard checks.

I just think the switch to having to play more defensive is hurting his offensive totals this year, heck it hurt Vinny Lecavilier the next year, but he rebounded the next year with a complete two-way game.

Vanek is still going into his prime, and can score 40 goals and is learning to play sound defense.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:19 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Vanek won't leave, plus hes been doing some very big hitting and playing much more sound defense than people make it out to be.

The Vancouver game he did a few stick lifts and stole the puck, and a few games before he landed some hard checks.

I just think the switch to having to play more defensive is hurting his offensive totals this year, heck it hurt Vinny Lecavilier the next year, but he rebounded the next year with a complete two-way game.

Vanek is still going into his prime, and can score 40 goals and is learning to play sound defense.


I forget how young Vanek really still is.

He's turning into quite a play maker as well, and defensively he's been pretty solid lately.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:28 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Vanek won't leave, plus hes been doing some very big hitting and playing much more sound defense than people make it out to be.

The Vancouver game he did a few stick lifts and stole the puck, and a few games before he landed some hard checks.

I just think the switch to having to play more defensive is hurting his offensive totals this year, heck it hurt Vinny Lecavilier the next year, but he rebounded the next year with a complete two-way game.

Vanek is still going into his prime, and can score 40 goals and is learning to play sound defense.


I forget how young Vanek really still is.

He's turning into quite a play maker as well, and defensively he's been pretty solid lately.


hes not young when it comes to player development. most players reach their potential in skill at 22-23... BUT, he is learning to play 2-way hockey, and thats huge. i dont ever think he will be a 50 goal scorer, but a 40 goal guy who plays solid both ways? yes please. and his 2-way game has taken huge steps this year.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:39 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Irony, I agree, but defense is something that has to be taught, goal scoring is usually a natural process.

And with the entire team being forced to play two-way hockey, instead of the offensive run-n-gun style, he becomes a much better player also.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:40 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
im not arguing with ya, bossman. i agree.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:43 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Oh I know, I agree with what you said also. Just wanted to add a bit more.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:48 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
As Vanek learns to be more of a play maker, he's going to be more difficult for teams to play against because they won't always assume he's shooting.

My biggest complaint about Thomas was that he was one dimensional.

He's slowly but surely making me eat my words.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Jim Bob
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:44 am 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:01 am
Posts: 540
Howie Hodge wrote:
I highly doubt that Vanek, at his salary, is an attractive acquisition for teams. Like him or not; he is underperforming on his contract.


I think a lot of teams would feel like he would explode if he were moved.

Heck, some people might use Max's year with the Thrashers as a reason why they would believe that Vanek could get back to being a 40+ goal per year guy.....

_________________
Sabres Hockey: Commitment to Mediocrity


Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo Slice
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:14 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 2708
I like Vanek, and I'm sure he'll return to form (Maybe), but his perceived lack of hustle/heart/speed hurts us. I'm sure he does hustle, and I'm sure he is into the game, but man, it doesn't look like it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Howie Hodge
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:06 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 3962
Location: Depew
Jim Bob wrote:
Howie Hodge wrote:
I highly doubt that Vanek, at his salary, is an attractive acquisition for teams. Like him or not; he is underperforming on his contract.


I think a lot of teams would feel like he would explode if he were moved.

Heck, some people might use Max's year with the Thrashers as a reason why they would believe that Vanek could get back to being a 40+ goal per year guy.....



At $7 million per that's a risky proposition. I doubt many teams would be willing to take that chance. Good two way players are not in that tax bracket; top scorers are. Max was picked up inexpensively, so the gamble wasn't nearly as large.

I'm not blaming Vanek for his contract either, but it is what it is.

_________________
"I'll rap you with my cane; you pencil necked geek!!"

-Bowler, imitating Freddy Blassie, at the very first M & G.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:29 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
hes not even 1 year removed from a 40 goal season. it could just be an anomaly for him.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresrocker56
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:26 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 880
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Vanek won't leave, plus hes been doing some very big hitting and playing much more sound defense than people make it out to be.

The Vancouver game he did a few stick lifts and stole the puck, and a few games before he landed some hard checks.

I just think the switch to having to play more defensive is hurting his offensive totals this year, heck it hurt Vinny Lecavilier the next year, but he rebounded the next year with a complete two-way game.

Vanek is still going into his prime, and can score 40 goals and is learning to play sound defense.


I forget how young Vanek really still is.

He's turning into quite a play maker as well, and defensively he's been pretty solid lately.


hes not young when it comes to player development. most players reach their potential in skill at 22-23... BUT, he is learning to play 2-way hockey, and thats huge. i dont ever think he will be a 50 goal scorer, but a 40 goal guy who plays solid both ways? yes please. and his 2-way game has taken huge steps this year.

If only Marcus was here to tell us how wrong we are about Vanek. :p

_________________
Rest in Peace Nani. 10/3/10

Gerbacity

NYIntensity wrote:
Sabres2Sabres wrote:
If Miller and Myers were playing like they did last year, we'd probably be over 500 right now.

If I had decided to jerk off instead, I probably wouldn't be paying child support...


"Grier coming in over the line. He leaves it to Gaustad. The shot. THEY SCOOOREE!! RING UP ANOTHER ONE FOR THE GOOSE!!! HONK IF YA HEAR THE GOOSE!! 3-0 BUFFALO!"


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:52 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
maybe markus should come around and tell us how wrong he was about vanek. it was never about production with markus, but how well he tried defensively. and weve all seen vanek playing well defensively.

but he will probably cop out with hes not blocking enough shots or something. and thus, was right all along.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:01 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
hes not even 1 year removed from a 40 goal season. it could just be an anomaly for him.


That's typically how it goes.

This place has jumped on so many just in the past five years or so that I've been posting/lurking ("this place" includes the old boards, oooobviously), because they had anomaly years before going on to play well as usual...

Wouldn't be Buffalo fans if they didn't. :D

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresrocker56
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:08 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 880
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
maybe markus should come around and tell us how wrong he was about vanek. it was never about production with markus, but how well he tried defensively. and weve all seen vanek playing well defensively.

but he will probably cop out with hes not blocking enough shots or something. and thus, was right all along.

I do get angry when I see him gun a perfect opportunity wide of the net but I usually see him going right to the backcheck and usually making a much better defensive play. I think this is the year where he grasps the defensive end and then next year he will be one of the better two way players in the league.

_________________
Rest in Peace Nani. 10/3/10

Gerbacity

NYIntensity wrote:
Sabres2Sabres wrote:
If Miller and Myers were playing like they did last year, we'd probably be over 500 right now.

If I had decided to jerk off instead, I probably wouldn't be paying child support...


"Grier coming in over the line. He leaves it to Gaustad. The shot. THEY SCOOOREE!! RING UP ANOTHER ONE FOR THE GOOSE!!! HONK IF YA HEAR THE GOOSE!! 3-0 BUFFALO!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: