Hammygoodness wrote:
I think it's a little from column A a little from column B. Do I think the Sabres lack toughness? In certain respects.
I think they do a pretty good job of engaging in physical battles for pucks and going to the front of the net. Now granted, most of my positive observations along the physical lines must be tempered over the past dozen games or so, where I think they're sliding. But I don't think you can say this team is unwilling to pay the price.
I do think a lot of opponents shots are from bad angles and from the outside, meaning you're probably not blocking as many. Could they be better? I suppose. But watching games night in and night out I don't see it as a deficiency. You can throw the stat at me that they're in the bottom of the league, but what I don't see are golden scoring chances against that should have been blocked. PSPs answer that their defensive game plan may contribute to this is a reasonable theory.
Hitting. God, I am so sick of people talking about this. I'll quote Ruff on this. "Hitting doesn't equal winning." Do I love a big hit? Of course. See: Patrick Kaleta. Do I like seeing someone take a run at an opposing defenseman 2 seconds after he releases the puck, way behind the play? No. Pointless hit, in my opinion. I don't care if they dump the puck in and send two guys hard on the forecheck but don't get credited with a hit. If they pressure the D and end up with the puck, I'm a happy fan. Guys scrumming along the boards or behind the net is the epitome of physical play, but it's not going to show up in stat sheets. So long as I see guys like Kennedy, Hecht, Ellis, Gaustad, Stafford and Pominville (yes, Pominville) engaging in battles for the puck, or guys like Gaustad, Vanek, Stafford and Grier take a pounding in front of the net trying to set up position, I feel no deficit. On top of that, hitting isn't a uniform stat. It's measured by someone at the home arena. So maybe the guy in Buffalo just doesn't credit "hits" as easily. Whatever the reason, I really don't care. If the Sabres are playing solid games and using their bodies effectively, so long as they're winning, I don't care what the stats are. See also: goals and points leaders on the team.
The one area I feel they're lacking is in standing up for each other. Miller was run, and Myers was the only one to go after Phillips, and that late. And it's not the first time some retribution was called for. Part of the problem is that for it to be immediate, it's got to be somebody already on the ice. Signing some skill deficient enforcer won't help in that regard. Another problem is that the guys they likely tagged for this aren't living up to it (Rivet, Montador). Mair was never a heavyweight. Goose can't seem to get anyone to agree to drop 'em. Grier, well he was always gritty, but I don't remember him dropping the gloves much.
I don't care about fighting majors or where they rank in that regard, so long as there's hell to pay when the opponents take liberties with some of our players. This has not happened. Maybe it's a team culture thing. I don't know, but it's the one area of toughness I think you're legitimately correct to worry about, ETC.
Ham
i agree with everything you said, minus the phillips thing. i dont think he ran miller, just bumped him and knocked him down. a 2 minute penalty, and what myers did was good. but someone was saying mair should run phillips later in the game? hell no. it was over at that point, and myers, as well as the offical, acted accordingly. thats how far it got, and thats how far it should have gotten.