Squanto wrote:
1crozier1 wrote:
The Sabres have a GM that stands pat with the same coach who's missed the playoffs 5 of the past 7 years, and believes in keeping the same "core guys" {Roy, Poms, Vanek, Goose, etc.} together for years, thinking that one of these days, they'll just magically become a clone of Malkin, Crosby, and Staal . . .
.
Ah, the old '5 in 7' argument.
A great way to ignore the turmoil that the franchise was in, and cherry pick the stats that try to make your point.
Nobody was screaming about how bad Darcy was in 05-06. Nobody was yelling about how bad these players were in 06-07.
I will have to say something here on this Squanto. Let's call a spade a spade on this one. No one was complaining those years because the team put an entertaining, exciting, successful product on the ice. The 2 main elements of that team (Drury and Briere) were the core reasons some of the current roster players saw successful stats. Lets call it as it is, Roy, Staffords rookie season, Pomminville and Vanek were 4 players that are capable I am sure, of success, but at the end of the day, the 2 players mentioned that are missing had a major impact of some of these players.
I don't find it unreasonable to ask why Darcy wouldn't make the same analysis and attempt to find a couple of players that would fit nicely into the system.
I would think Sharp and Versteeg from Chicago might fit that mold (just a fans opinion however, not an expert). The D could use someone as well.
All the sarcasm for my "The Sky Is Falling" post, put aside. I am anticipating some move from the team, regardless as to the current slump or a successful run. Isn't it the GM's job to be constantly looking for ways to better the team?
His current remarks to the press haven't really inspired many fans.