CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
fly as hale wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2011/2/14/1993218/on-ryan-miller-sergei-bobrovsky-the-media-and-team-effects-on
Article on Miller's performance this year along with things on Thomas, Boucher and Bobrovski. I'm just waiting for Bobrovski to choke come playoff time.
Is Miller having a worse season? Certainly. Is he right around league-average? Yes, yes he is. But he's still above league average in ES SV%, and he's mostly being hurt by shorthanded goals scored against the Sabres. But his play at even-strength is only marginally worse than his established talent level. Does that make him run-of-the-mill? No. It makes him unlucky and the victim of small sample-sizes. But most people see the 0.909 overall save percentage and use it as justification for their hyperbolic "run-of-the-mill netminder" statement. And they're wrong.That is basically the point I'm trying to make when people just want to look at his GAA and SV% and that's it.
Well I think the clutch argument is just as bad. I've some, but not much from Miller to call him a clutch goaltender. In fact, you could make a case for the opposite by pointing out failures in the ECFs, Winter Classic, and Gold Medal Game. (For the record, I don't agree with this, but it is out there. Miller hasn't won many big games at the professional level.)
It's kind of sad to think, but I really don't have any way to argue against that.
I mean, it seems as though he quite often comes up big during shootouts and penalty shots, or breakaways during games in general.
I could argue that two of the events you mentioned, he was beaten by the best player in the NHL, one of the events you mentioned was his first trip to the NHL playoffs, and the other trip to the ECF was against an Ottawa team that the Sabres just couldn't play well against.
He's won a Vezina. He's shown that he is capable of playing at a higher level.
Yet here we are.
I don't know. It's a tough call.