It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 12:48 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:26 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Every game Buffalo has played against boston this year, they haven't given a ****... Including the ones they won.



What makes you think Boston gave a **** in those games, even the wons they won?


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:34 am 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
I don't understand people who say there are no worries about Boston. There are worries about EVERY playoff team and series, and Boston has a red hot goaltender, which is the one factor that can decide any series, in any round.

I sure as hell hope Buffalo is worried about Boston and plays like it. Too often this team plays like they don't have a care in the world. The Bs are a team that can beat us, make no mistake about it and we will most likely face them in the first round.

The Sabres should handle the Bruins, but not if they adopt this laissez-faire, no worries attitude.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
1crozier1
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:13 am 
Offline
Late-Round Gem

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:25 pm
Posts: 51
Godzilla1960 wrote:
I don't understand people who say there are no worries about Boston. There are worries about EVERY playoff team and series, and Boston has a red hot goaltender, which is the one factor that can decide any series, in any round.

I sure as hell hope Buffalo is worried about Boston and plays like it. Too often this team plays like they don't have a care in the world. The Bs are a team that can beat us, make no mistake about it and we will most likely face them in the first round.

The Sabres should handle the Bruins, but not if they adopt this laissez-faire, no worries attitude.



Amen. And amen.

One good thing about playing the Bruins in the first round: if they beat them, it will excellent practice for the Washingtons, New Jerseys, and Pittsburghs they'd have to face later -- 'cause, just like those teams, they have size up front and a goalie who can close you out . . .


.

_________________
“This is a good building to play in,” Roy said. “It’s kind of quiet.”

-- forward Derek Roy, following the Sabres' 2-1 OT win over the Atlanta Thrashers on Jan. 14, 2010, a game where the home team drew just over 11,000 fans {the ninth time in 22 home games they failed to draw 12,000}


Top
 Profile  
 
patkane88
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:19 am 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:23 am
Posts: 5129
Location: London, Ontario
Well didn't Lalime start in at least two of the games against Boston??

_________________
just call me Brad

Twitter @BUrbanowicz13


Top
 Profile  
 
Wozniak
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:29 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:11 am
Posts: 2864
Location: Chicago
1crozier1 wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
I don't understand people who say there are no worries about Boston. There are worries about EVERY playoff team and series, and Boston has a red hot goaltender, which is the one factor that can decide any series, in any round.

I sure as hell hope Buffalo is worried about Boston and plays like it. Too often this team plays like they don't have a care in the world. The Bs are a team that can beat us, make no mistake about it and we will most likely face them in the first round.

The Sabres should handle the Bruins, but not if they adopt this laissez-faire, no worries attitude.



Amen. And amen.

One good thing about playing the Bruins in the first round: if they beat them, it will excellent practice for the Washingtons, New Jerseys, and Pittsburghs they'd have to face later -- 'cause, just like those teams, they have size up front and a goalie who can close you out . . .


.

...im not following. Boston doesnt have anything close to the scoring threat that Washington or Pittsburgh have. they also are not nearly as good as New Jersey in any way shape or form.

I dont get the pessimism. yes, there are no easy games in the playoffs and yes, no team should take another team lightly but the tone of these threads would make someone think that the Sabres are going to get destroyed in the playoffs which is will not (should not) be the case. this team didnt get to be 3rd in the East by getting lucky bounces all season.

now, im not saying that they are a lock for the Cup by any means, but it seems that every thread here a doomsday thread.

_________________
Check out my website: http://www.artistzero.com

"That wasn't very nice...I do believe you killed my hat."

Driver of the FIRE LINDY RUFF Bandwagon since 2008.


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:24 am 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Wozniak wrote:
1crozier1 wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
I don't understand people who say there are no worries about Boston. There are worries about EVERY playoff team and series, and Boston has a red hot goaltender, which is the one factor that can decide any series, in any round.

I sure as hell hope Buffalo is worried about Boston and plays like it. Too often this team plays like they don't have a care in the world. The Bs are a team that can beat us, make no mistake about it and we will most likely face them in the first round.

The Sabres should handle the Bruins, but not if they adopt this laissez-faire, no worries attitude.


Amen. And amen.

One good thing about playing the Bruins in the first round: if they beat them, it will excellent practice for the Washingtons, New Jerseys, and Pittsburghs they'd have to face later -- 'cause, just like those teams, they have size up front and a goalie who can close you out . . .

.

...im not following. Boston doesnt have anything close to the scoring threat that Washington or Pittsburgh have. they also are not nearly as good as New Jersey in any way shape or form.

I dont get the pessimism. yes, there are no easy games in the playoffs and yes, no team should take another team lightly but the tone of these threads would make someone think that the Sabres are going to get destroyed in the playoffs which is will not (should not) be the case. this team didnt get to be 3rd in the East by getting lucky bounces all season.

now, im not saying that they are a lock for the Cup by any means, but it seems that every thread here a doomsday thread.

Well, I don't think you can be a longterm Buffalo sports fan without picking up some degree of pessimism. However, in this particular instance it isn't Boston's goal scoring potential (or lack thereof) that it the main concern. It is their stingy defense. Of the 16 playoff teams only New Jersey has given up fewer goals than Boston this year.

Defense scares me more in the playoffs than does offense. We have Ryan Miller to handle the other team's hot offense. But, when the other guys have a hot goaltender and a stingy defense, then we have to rely on our offense to win the game and that is where the confidence level drops a little.

Buffalo should beat Boston. I expect them to beat Boston. However, it is not a cakewalk and of the eight #5-8 seeds in the East and West, I think an objective observor would say the greatest chance for an upset over their higher seeded opponents would be Detroit in the West and Boston in the East.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:47 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Godzilla1960 wrote:

Buffalo should beat Boston. I expect them to beat Boston. However, it is not a cakewalk and of the eight #5-8 seeds in the East and West, I think an objective observor would say the greatest chance for an upset over their higher seeded opponents would be Detroit in the West and Boston in the East.


I disagree. Philadelphia owned New Jersey this season. 5-1 record and it didn't matter who was in net.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:38 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
powerplayer wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Every game Buffalo has played against boston this year, they haven't given a ****... Including the ones they won.



What makes you think Boston gave a **** in those games, even the wons they won?


Did you watch them play? Bostons games against buffalo were some of the best they played all year.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:51 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Boston can be shaky defensively, great at times, sucks at other times.

Rask is the x-factor. Can he steal a series, or will he fold under the big lights carrying the load?


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:23 am 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
Boston doesn't have the offense this season to come out on top in a 7 game series if Miller continues to play this well, and our best offensive players (Poms, Vanek, Rov) keep this momentum up. I say its not gonna be easy, and see a lot of 1 goal games, but ultimately we get the win.

_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Every game Buffalo has played against boston this year, they haven't given a ****... Including the ones they won.



What makes you think Boston gave a **** in those games, even the wons they won?


Did you watch them play? Bostons games against buffalo were some of the best they played all year.


and this is what scares me. a team that doesnt care. of course the playoffs are a different animal, but a team that takes nights off is prone to taking nights off ANY time. its a bad habit to get into.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Every game Buffalo has played against boston this year, they haven't given a ****... Including the ones they won.



What makes you think Boston gave a **** in those games, even the wons they won?


Did you watch them play? Bostons games against buffalo were some of the best they played all year.


and this is what scares me. a team that doesnt care. of course the playoffs are a different animal, but a team that takes nights off is prone to taking nights off ANY time. its a bad habit to get into.

Every team takes some nights off, not just our beloved Sabres.

To think every team in this league can just play their best through 82 games without taking a night of is ridiculous.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
OldTimeHockey
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:39 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:13 pm
Posts: 1661
patkane88 wrote:
Well didn't Lalime start in at least two of the games against Boston??


I think Lalime played 1 and Enroth played a game against hte Bruins.

I think Miller has 2 regulation wins an a SO loss, and an OT loss.

_________________
If your having goal problems, I feel bad for ya son....we got 99 problems but Vanek ain't one!


Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo Slice
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:45 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 2708
Yeah, Boston's offense will not beat Miller 4 times. Buffalo in 6.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Every game Buffalo has played against boston this year, they haven't given a ****... Including the ones they won.



What makes you think Boston gave a **** in those games, even the wons they won?


Did you watch them play? Bostons games against buffalo were some of the best they played all year.


and this is what scares me. a team that doesnt care. of course the playoffs are a different animal, but a team that takes nights off is prone to taking nights off ANY time. its a bad habit to get into.

Every team takes some nights off, not just our beloved Sabres.

To think every team in this league can just play their best through 82 games without taking a night of is ridiculous.


id make sure my team was the hardest working in hockey. bag skate for any wasted effort.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
2 wins, 1 OT loss, 1 tie with Miller in net. You can't count the shootout as anything but a tie since that's what it is in the playoffs. Even the OT loss is suspect since playoff OT is 5 on 5, and we're not great 4 on 4.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
2 wins, 1 OT loss, 1 tie with Miller in net. You can't count the shootout as anything but a tie since that's what it is in the playoffs. Even the OT loss is suspect since playoff OT is 5 on 5, and we're not great 4 on 4.


I really hate this kinda spin.

Face it, Boston played the Sabres tough all season long and were awfully banged up most of that time. They played 38 different players this season. Thirty-eight. They have some health back (sans Savard) and are not going to lay down. And as others have said, don't write off Rask, as he is the only netminder in the league with better numbers than Miller (I know, less games, blah, blah, blah).

You are trying to talk yourself into the idea of Sabre dominance over the Bruins. Ain't gonna be that easy.

And there are no ties in the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
if this series ends in any less then 7 games, ill be shocked.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
powerplayer wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
2 wins, 1 OT loss, 1 tie with Miller in net. You can't count the shootout as anything but a tie since that's what it is in the playoffs. Even the OT loss is suspect since playoff OT is 5 on 5, and we're not great 4 on 4.


I really hate this kinda spin.

Face it, Boston played the Sabres tough all season long and were awfully banged up most of that time. They played 38 different players this season. Thirty-eight. They have some health back (sans Savard) and are not going to lay down. And as others have said, don't write off Rask, as he is the only netminder in the league with better numbers than Miller (I know, less games, blah, blah, blah).

You are trying to talk yourself into the idea of Sabre dominance over the Bruins. Ain't gonna be that easy.

And there are no ties in the playoffs.


Egh, I'm right and I have no problem with it. The fact is there are no shootouts and four on four overtimes in the playoffs so you can't really think of the two extra time losses as anything beyond end of regulation ties if you want to transfer their result to an indication of how this series might go.

Boston had very few goals scored and very few goals allowed so they pretty much played everyone tough, the sabres are no different in that respect.

I took the Sabres in six, which isn't exactly dominance. I have no desire to talk myself into anything being supremely confident that the outcome will be the outcome regardless of what I say or do. History has shown this has been the case 100% of the time.

There is a reason one of these teams finished third and the other finished sixth. If it were the NFL playoffs I might be a bit more nervous about the potential outcome, but over the course of a seven game or less series with the ability to adapt night in and night out to the same opponent, I see the Sabres faring very well regardless of what the season series might tell you.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
So the season series has bearing on this outcome at all?

What they did in the season means jack squat, yes it means nothing. You could dominate your opponent in the season yet fail to win in the playoffs.

This is the playoffs, clean slate for all teams, throw all season stats out the window, they don't mean anything now.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron