OldTimeHockey wrote:
gr8daygo wrote:
fly as hale wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
I think the Sabres re-sign both either way.
Well the Sabres have to re-sign Kaleta regardless, don't they?
BlueandYellow wrote:
Arbitration is dumb.
No...
I believe so.... because it is team driven... Kaleta has to accept on either a one year or two year deal.... but thats just my understanding... the Sabres can also get a deal done before the hearing... which is the option I am hoping for... Id like a happy Patty K for 2010/11... and if he doesn't get the number he wants will he be happy? He is one guy I would not mind over paying a little bit just to make him happy... i love what he brings to the team...
It's dumb because when does a player EVER get less money? It's always how much more than the contract offered by the team. It's all or nothing and binding, which is dumb because some spend happy panel of arbiters tell you how you should spend your money.
Not really, you think Briere wasn't worth the 5 million he was awarded?
It also puts egos in check sometimes. The team gives the arbitrator am offer, the p[layer does the same, normally it's happy medium between the two prices.
Even though they are RFA's, they aren't the biggest worry and priority, they have no bargaining stance right now and Darcy was smart to make sure an offer sheet isn't thrown to Patty K. even if you think he should have been signed July 2nd of last year.
_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.
Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.