Displaced Fan wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
You think the Sedin's are superstars? I guess it's really easy for a guy to become a superstar in your book. To me they are stars, all-stars in fact, and certainly potential superstars. They got one 100 point season between them, be still my heart. I guess Roy and Vanek are superstars too?
Well you did ask
Quote:
Who else besides Ovechkin and Crosby could the league overexpose?
so obviously a tandem like two twin brothers who play on the same line and are fucking great would be a good choice. Last season Henrik ended with 112 points and Daniel could have finished over the hundred mark as well if he hadn't broken his foot. This season Henrik is leading the league in assists and is 4th in overall points with 49 in 36 games played while Daniel is at 47 points (6th overall) in 36 games played. Now how couldn't these two be superstars?

Also, you don't need to be a top scoring forward to be a superstar in my book. Guys like Miller, Mike Green, Pronger, Chara etc have been in the spot light before and could be concidered in that tier by some people.
So after about 10 years in the NHL they are just now starting to put up some gaudy numbers.
Whao...how....amazing?
I mean they are great players to be sure, and yeah they are marketable, I'd love to hear more about them and I do enjoy watching them play. But have they really earned nauseating exposure?
If the Sedin's continue to play like this through the playoffs and throughout next season then I would have to say yes, it's time to put them right up there with 8 and 87. Same with Stamkos.
Let's hope they have what it takes.