It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 12:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next
Author Message
Sabretooth
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:06 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:52 am
Posts: 1122
jordano wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
and here i was thinking the 2005-2006 sabres lost because of injury.


That is correct. No one thought of players getting injured after the deadline. Had we acquired one or two rental players for depth in exchange for Noronen, I think we would have done better against the Hurricanes.

And who do you think we would have gotten in return for Noronen? He was a plug and swiss cheese to boot. I'm sure trading him away would have solved all of our problems.


It would have if we received a prospect instead of a draft pick in return.

_________________
Let's go Buffalo!


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:07 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
Sabretooth wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
All of our positions were fine, we just got a shit ton of good players hurt. Darcy can't prepare for injuries he doesn't even know will happen.


When you have no depth to depend on when your entire team is ailing leads to failure. Smart general managers will prepare for that, even if they do not know what may happen.

Who knows what general manager you would be?


So the Sabres should now get a shit ton of mediocre players in case someone gets injured? Is that what you're saying? Because that would be stupid. You keep maybe 1 or 2 replacements, that's it. You don't have a whole backup team (well, you honestly can't, but you probably didn't think of that) in case a player gets injured.

You, in fact, would ruin a team if you were a gm.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabretooth
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:52 am
Posts: 1122
BlueandYellow wrote:
So the Sabres should now get a shit ton of mediocre players in case someone gets injured? Is that what you're saying? Because that would be stupid. You keep maybe 1 or 2 replacements, that's it. You don't have a whole backup team (well, you honestly can't, but you probably didn't think of that) in case a player gets injured.

You, in fact, would ruin a team if you were a gm.


Really? The same would go for you.

Let us go crazy!


_________________
Let's go Buffalo!


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Don't allow them a single shot on goal. Kill.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
I want my 2 points

Image

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Yhoshi
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:39 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:18 pm
Posts: 2165
Location: Austria
:?

_________________
HOCKEY IS BACK!


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:24 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
This is the fourth straight game that the St. Louis Blues have had scouts at the foot of Washington Street.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:27 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:47 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
mechaphil wrote:
This is the fourth straight game that the St. Louis Blues have had scouts at the foot of Washington Street.


CAN THEY PLEASE JUST GIVE US BACKES!!! PPPPLLLLEEEEEEEEAAAASSEEEEE!!! :lol: :drool:

in all seriousness, what do you think the deal would look like? Any centers worth a look? Any top D we could pair with Myers?

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
shedoesntgetit
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:02 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:35 pm
Posts: 1026
i'm about to go watch the game with this guy i'm kind of interested in. wonder if he'll be judging me by how much i really know about hockey, like i will be him.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:05 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?


every single one of those teams made a significant move at the deadline.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:07 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?


every single one of those teams made a significant move at the deadline.

And what were they then?

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Last edited by Skyline_BNR34 on Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:11 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?


every single one of those teams made a significant move at the deadline.

And what were they then?


hawks made a deal with minnesota
pens got bill guerin
red wings got brad stuart
the ducks made 3 moves in february, and 2 on the deadline. brad may and o'brien.

what what?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:22 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Pwned.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:23 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
mechaphil wrote:
Pwned.


just a little. but alot of teams make significant deals at the deadline and they fall flat. of course only 1 team can win it, so many are bound to fall flat.

and dammit! this isnt internet gaming!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:28 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?


every single one of those teams made a significant move at the deadline.

And what were they then?


hawks made a deal with minnesota
pens got bill guerin
red wings got brad stuart
the ducks made 3 moves in february, and 2 on the deadline. brad may and o'brien.

what what?

I wouldn't say they were super significant. The Wings would have probably won without Brad Stuart. The Pens, yes they got Guerin, and Kunitz, but it was still the Malkin/Crosby show.
And the Hawks got Boytnon.

To me, those aren't hugely significant moves on the deadline. Just extra help it seems. In free agency is a different story though.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:32 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Sabretooth wrote:
If the only move you can make is trading away your tertiary goaltender for a second round pick to win the Stanley Cup when other positions can use depth for a playoff run, then you set yourself up for failure. Fortunately, the Sabres went very deep with no serious acquisitions, reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

If I recall, the Chicago Blackhawks didn't make a single trade last year for their Cup Run.

In 2009, the Penguins also didn't make a single Trade. Oh, in 2008, did the Redwings make a single trade to help them win the cup either? What about the Ducks, who did they move to help win a cup?


every single one of those teams made a significant move at the deadline.

And what were they then?


hawks made a deal with minnesota
pens got bill guerin
red wings got brad stuart
the ducks made 3 moves in february, and 2 on the deadline. brad may and o'brien.

what what?

I wouldn't say they were super significant. The Wings would have probably won without Brad Stuart. The Pens, yes they got Guerin, and Kunitz, but it was still the Malkin/Crosby show.
And the Hawks got Boytnon.

To me, those aren't hugely significant moves on the deadline. Just extra help it seems. In free agency is a different story though.


you said a single deal. all those teams added depth. in deals. that happened.

also stuart is detroits best defensemen, defensively. dont believe otherwise.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:32 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Guerin's leadership is why they won. Fact.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
mechaphil wrote:
Guerin's leadership is why they won. Fact.

It wasn't the 67 combined points from Malkin and Crosby. :roll:

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:39 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
but they didnt make a SINGLE move. or something.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron