Squanto wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
No, actually it doesn't surprise me at all that many don't understand my point.
I disagree. I'm fairly confident that most everyone here gets your point.
It's just that nobody agrees with it.

I explicitly illustrated the point in this hypothetical:
"IF that 7th loss actually DID cause Darcy to make several moves IMPORVING the team and getting that much closer to winning the cup, would you STILL be upset with the loss?"
To disagree, even with this spelled out, is just plain foolish.
Yes, we don't know what Darcy is thinking, HOWEVER, the only point I was making is that a POSITIVE byproduct of a loss to the Sharks may have been that it would contribute to, if not be the catalyst for, NEEDED CHANGE.
No talk of TRYING to lose, no talk of "encouraging a culture of losing", no "tanking" on purpose.
It's funny how many will take a straightforward and logical supposition and either misread and misquote it, or flat out not understand the underlying point.
And BY THE WAY...
If losing a game lands you in a more preferable playoff spot based on pairings and how well you match up with different teams, you'd have to be a fool to not acknowledge that in some cases, YES, a loss is better.
Unless of course you are a blind homer who cannot see past tonight's victory beer bash and haven't any concept of overall startegy in controlling your destiny in the post season.
For the umpteenth time, I never said to TRY and lose, but sometimes a loss is not as bad as you're making it out to be if it somehow can contribute to the greater good.
If that's too heavy for you, sorry I mentioned it.