Crosscheck wrote:
dontbethatguy wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/25/flashback-students-sang-b_n_300372.htmlI'll just leave this right here :-p
I'm so over this anyways. All of our financial problems would be gone if we just invaded Mars. If there was life then there is probably oil. Lets get on this NASA. NASA has a militant branch right?
Zilla mentioned that earlier but I don't see the comparison aside from it being an asinine thing to make kids do.
Quote:
Our country's stood beside us People have sent us aid. Katrina could not stop us, our hopes will never fade. Congress, Bush and FEMA People across our land Together have come to rebuild us and we join them hand-in-hand!
Replace that with "Bush our historic leader" and we'd be in the same ballpark.
I'm not really on the far left or right so I look at the FEMA thing and the Obama thing as being equally non-threatening. There are people on each side of the political spectrum who can take each and come up with arguments as to why the one they disagree with is brainwashing. To me though the context, content, and the sitting President for each song wasn't anything damaging for children to hear.
Just to play devils advocate though: it's not a big deal. The content of the songs aren't egregiously offensive. In each they promote strengthening our country. The Presidents, equally bad or good depending on who you ask. The context: the song was done during Black History Month, Obama is the first Black President which is historic, and to many Americans across all races/ethnicies he is an example of achieving the American dream.
No matter what you say, no matter what you're doing, when you're the first, you go down in history for being the first. I'd be willing to bet you that 99% of Americans can name George Washington as the first president but half wouldn't be able to name the 2nd president (especially my generation). So yes, during black history month for people to point out he's historic is fair.
The teacher had not contacted the White House and acted alone. The teacher's intentions weren't to indoctrinate but to shine the light on arguably the most famous black man in the world today during a month that is designated for celebrating all of the contributions black people have contributed to America.
Now why should it matter that it was black history month? Yes. It should matter because framing it in that context gives some insight as to why this was done. Was it right? That one is less clear. Some parents didn't care. Others do. There is no real gauge for figuring out what the teacher's real intent was. So you can either take her at her word or choose to believe otherwise.
Personally I don't feel like it's something that should be done but I was the kid growing up who thought winners should celebrate a win with a smile and a handshake. I get why this song was made and I don't feel like the teacher was trying to indoctrinate the children anymore than public schools already do. So I don't feel the umbrage that others get when they see/hear this.
One of the greatest examples of indoctrination in America is US history. During WWII we did no wrong. Vietnam wasn't that bad... We fought in Korea? During the start founding of this great country we traded Native Americans for their land... I'm not sure if this is still the norm nowadays but it was back when I went school (both private and public).
Until I went to college most of the US history I studied glossed over or barely mentioned any missteps this country has made. In high school we spent 1 week covering Civil Rights, half a class on Vietnam, zero time about the missteps in WWII, and like 2 or 3 classes on our history with Native Americans. Oh and we spent zero time covering the atrocities that early immigrants to this country faced. So the Irish, Germans, and Italians apparently just showed up and had a blast. Coffee was served and then they all had a rousing game of baseball in the street.