powerplayer wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Squanto wrote:
Oh, that spot.
Yeah, that's the outer wall of the building. Could only add there if you rebuilt the upper half of the building and roof.
yikes. it just seems like they could cut out spaces in that wall, make sure there is some beams left, and add suites. but if theres no ledge, then yeah, thats a no go. i thought there might be a ledge outside. just an idea.
Even if they could put suites way up there, why would anyone want them? You rent the suite for, among other things, the "perfect view". Nosebleed seems anticlimactic---kind of a good news/bad news thing.
Also...
I may be in the minority on this, but I will never understand what's so great about the 200 level seating. If I had all the money in the world, I would be on the glass---or somewhere in the low rows of the 100s. Interestingly enough, the prices for seats OTG and those in the 200's are similar. Given the choice, it's a no-brainer: OTG!
I've made it back to Buffalo the past two Thanksgivings. Last year we went to the Hurricanes game and sat center ice in the 200's. Great seats, great view, "club" setting was nice. Seats were a little bigger too, I think?
This year we went to two games. At the Toronto game we sat in row 17 of Sec116 (right in the middle of the zone) and the view was FAR better, IMHO. I'm like a kid down there, being able to see players faces and shit is just incredible to me. In all honesty, row 12 is probably the best, lol. We (the gf and I) will try to sit down there the next time we go.
Let me tell you though, after seeing that hit by Kaleta at the TOR game from 17 rows up, I was "sold" on those seats. Only complaint I have is that I wish they were slightly bigger.